386 F.2d 832 - Heller v. Roberts — 386 F.2d 832

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently January 2005

7 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

¶1Harry Heller, New York City, pro se. Harry Alan Sherman, Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel.

¶2Robert E. Hugh, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for defendant-ap-pellee.

¶3Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM;

¶5The complaint claims federal jurisdiction “based on the Federal Civil Rights statutes [42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 (1964)], the Constitution of the United States and the 14th Amendment thereto.” Actually, the allegations would appear to be in support of an action for slander arising out of the utterance by defendant, then an Assistant District Attorney, in open court of an allegedly derogatory word concerning plaintiff, a lawyer, admitted to practice in the State of New York. Plaintiff endeavors to bring this action within federal jurisdiction by asserting that he has been deprived “of his property and personal rights and professional status, contrary to the Constitution and laws of the United States” by reason of the alleged slander. From an order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

¶6The court below properly held that, construing the complaint most liberally, the alleged slander gives rise to no federal claim and that whatever bases there might be for a tort action under state law “they do not fall within the aegis of the Civil Rights Act.”

¶7Order affirmed.