Cobb v. Murrell’s Empirical Analysis
386 F.2d 947 · 1967
Citation profile
15 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 1992
15 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Douglas v. Alabama · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy · In re Disbarment of Gately · Brownell v. We Shung · Estrada v. Ahrens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Except so far as (1) statutes preclude judicial review or (2) agency action is by law committed to agency discretion— (a) Right of Review — Any person suffering legal wrong because of any agency action, or adversely affected or aggrieved by such action within the meaning of any relevant statute shall be entitled to judicial review thereof. (b) Form and Venue of Action — • The form of proceeding for judicial review shall be any special statutory proceeding relevant to the subject matter in any court specified by statute or, in the absence or inadequacy thereof, any applicable form of legal action (including actions for declaratory judgments or writs of prohibitory or mandatory injunction or habeas corpus) in any court of competent jurisdiction . . . ” 2”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The only argument which Cobb might now assert is that congressional action to aid employers, embodied in Section 1154(b), gave him a legally protected right which was violated by the Secretary of Labor, and that this right is sufficient for obtaining judicial review through either the APA or the Declaratory Judgment Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Thus, we are in agreement with the Ninth Circuit’s specific holding in Braude 2 that aliens outside the country have no standing to challenge a determination of the Secretary of Labor that their entry would adversely affect wages and working conditions of workers in the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.