Khotesouvan v. Morones’s Empirical Analysis
386 F.3d 1298 · 2004
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Zadvydas v. Davis · Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Department of the Interior and Bureau of Indian Affairss v. Klamath Water Users Protective Association · White v. Lambert · McNeely v. Blanas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“until at least 90 days of detention have passed,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trinh v. Homan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.