Mackey M’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
12 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Lillbask Mauclaire v. State of Connecticut Department of Education S (2005), Df Df Nf v. Ramapo Central School District
12 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central School District Bd of Ed Westchester County v. Rowley · School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of Education · Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. Carter · Walczak v. Florida Union Free School District · Thomas v. Cincinnati Board of Education
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the inquiry focuses on [first] identifying the then current educational placement, and ... [second] on who should pay for it, for implicit in the maintenance of the status quo is the requirement that a school district .continue to finance an educational placement made by the agency and consented to by the parent before the parent requested a due process hearing. To cut off public funds would amount to a unilateral change in placement, prohibited by the Act [IDEA],”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[D]uring the pendency of any proceedings conducted pursuant to this section, unless the State or local educational agency and the parents otherwise agree, the child shall remain in the then-current educational placement of the child, or, if applying for initial admission to a public school, shall, with the consent of the parents, be placed in the public school program until all such proceedings have been completed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) typically the placement described in the child's most recently implemented IEP; (2) the operative placement actually functioning at the time ... when the stay put provision of the IDEA was invoked; [or] (3) [the placement at the time of] the previously implemented IEP.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.