Ven v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
386 F.3d 357 · 2004
Citation profile
21 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Ishak v. Gonzales (2005), Zeru v. Gonzales (2007)
21 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · COELHO · Zhang v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must be upheld unless it was made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“A motion to reopen or reconsider does not toll the period for filing a petition for judicial review of the underlying order of deportation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.