Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 386 F.3d 668 - House v. Bell

House v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis

386 F.3d 668 · 2004

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017

6 federal appellate ·

10020042010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Lindh v. Murphy · Schlup v. Delo · Bousley v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[S]he was ‘bitching him out’ because he didn’t take her fishing that night, that he went to the dance instead. He said when he come home that she was still on him pretty heavily ‘bitching him out’ again and that he smacked her and that she fell and hit her head. He said I didn’t mean to do it, but I had to get rid of her, because I didn’t want to be charged with murder.” App. 232-233.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““I tried to speak to the Sheriff but he was real busy. He sent me to a deputy. The deputy told me to go upstairs to the courtroom and talk to this guy, I can’t remember his name. I never did really get to talk to anybody.” App. 234.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.