Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 386 P2D 326 - Ellis v. State

Ellis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
January 1978
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1152 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153

Relies on Seymour v. Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary · Tooisgah v. United States · Application of De Marrias · 81 Okla. Crim. 176 - Ex Parte Wallace · Ellis v. Raines

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Where Indian pleads guilty to information charging rape in first degree and no jurisdictional question is raised until after more than three years have elapsed so as to bar prosecution in either state or federal court, the jurisdiction of the state court can not be challenged in collateral proceeding in habeas corpus on ground that land on which offense was committed was restricted Indian allotment and that the person assaulted was a restricted Indian.” “When information charges crime of rape was committed in Cotton County, the jurisdiction of the court is an issue in the trial court; the plea of guilty by accused who appears with counsel and the finding of guilt and sentence of accused upon his plea of guilty is conclusive finding of jurisdiction and such finding may not be attacked in a collateral proceeding. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.