Baker v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Woolfolk v. Semrod · Finley v. Board of County Commissioners · Tuck v. Buller · Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Price · First State Bank of Noble v. McKiddy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is to be remembered that the trial court has considerable latitude, in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion, in the following instances, to-wit: . (3), in permitting the introduction of rebuttal testimony (See Caughlin v. Sheets, 206 Okl. 283 , 242 P.2d 724 ).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Swyden v. Killiam
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.