Thomas v. Roth’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2017
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · North American Uranium, Inc. v. Johnston · 56 Wash. 2d 204 - Glaser v. Holdorf · Dame v. Mileski · Rue v. Merrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(b) Separate trials. — The court in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counterclaim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tremblay v. Reid“[I]f an instrument required for recor-dation to be acknowledged is without an acknowledgment and is admitted to record, the recordation does not afford constructive notice of the existence and contents of the instrument.”) . The Wyoming Supreme Court has found that a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.