Hurst v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently September 2014
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Powell · Jacoby v. City of Gillette · Arnold v. Krigbaum · 19 Cal. App. 518 - Knight v. Black · Kaufmann v. Liggett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he rule [against splitting] differs from res judicata inasmuch as it is based exclusively on public policyf, for example] ... to prevent multiplicity of suits, prevent vexatious litigation, and to avoid duplication of costs and expenses,” rather than on the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a mere finding of the amount of rent due, even though that amount be in excess of the jurisdictional limitation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.