Commonwealth v. Saunders’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 110 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 129 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably State v. Valdez (1962), State v. Driver (1962)
11 federal appellate · 110 state decisions — followed in 15 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Kloiber · State v. Frost · 168 Pa. Super. 152 - Commonwealth v. Palarino · 179 Pa. Super. 64 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Riccio v. Dilworth · Kvaternik v. Yochim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 129 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it must be borne in mind that we are dealing here, not with the hearsay testimony of witnesses who merely heard such identifications being made, but with testimony given by those who themselves made the identifications at the lineup.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Since it is uniformly held that such a test is not judicially acceptable . it is obvious that neither a professed willingness nor refusal to submit to such a test should be admitted. Defendant’s offer was merely a self-serving act or declaration which obviously could be made without any possible risk, since, if the offer were accepted and the test given, the result, whether favorable or unfavorable to the accused, could not be given in evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. State“It was obvious to the court, to the jury and to the spectators that young Edward was telling the truth. He handled himself so intelligently, so quietly and so effectively on cross-examination that no one could doubt the sincerity of his story.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.