Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
38 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Cherry v. State · Caprood v. State · Jolly v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ i]n a CSC case, the testimony of a witness regarding the Victim’s out-of-court statement is not hearsay when: “The declarant testifies at the trial ... and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is ... consistent with the declarant’s testimony in a criminal sexual conduct case or attempted criminal sexual conduct case where the declarant is the alleged Victim and the statement is limited to the time and place of the incident.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Vail v. State · State v. Smith“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Milledge v. State · Smith v. State“hinged on the [v]ictim's credibility regarding [the] identification of the perpetrator, and there was otherwise an absence of overwhelming evidence of Smith's guilt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.