Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

386 So. 2d 31

Council v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1980-07-01

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1998

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1980-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant, Margaret Marie Council, appeals her conviction and sentence, including probation, for grand larceny. Appellant’s sentence was withheld and she was placed on probation for five years. A condition of the probation provides that appellant is to be confined for fifty-two weekends in the Dade County Jail.

¶2Appellant urges reversal on the grounds that (1) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the cause as being barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the mandatory sentence imposed as a condition of probation was not reasonably related to a rehabilitative purpose and its primary purpose was to punish; (3) the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the information for failure to state a crime under the laws of Florida.

¶3We have carefully considered appellant’s points on appeal in the light of the record, briefs and argument of counsel and have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated. Therefore the judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

¶4Affirmed.

/386/so2d/31 · .json · Public domain