Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 386 SO2D 939 - Ryan v. Security Indus. Ins. Co.

Ryan v. Security Indus. Ins. Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 2022

2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

9019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company · Marceleno v. State, Department of Highways · Pruitt v. Great Southern Life Ins. Co. · Bankson v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n · 368 So. 2d 1032 - Johnson v. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of Cal.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"B. In any application for life or health and accident insurance made in writing by the insured, all statements therein made by the insured shall, in the absence of fraud, be deemed representations and not warranties. The falsity of any such statement shall not bar the right to recovery under the contract unless such false statement was made with actual intent to deceive or unless it materially affected either the acceptance of the risk or the hazard assumed by the insurer."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The rule also prevails in this state that when the agent of an insurer, acting within the scope of his authority, proceeds to fill out the blanks in an application for a policy of insurance, the acts, representations and mistakes of that agent are considered to be those of the insurance company. In such a case if the agent by mistake, fraud or negligence inserts erroneous or untrue answers to the questions contained in the application, these representations bind the insurer but are not binding upon the insured, provided that the insured was justifiably ignorant of the erroneous answers, had no actual or implied knowledge thereof, was guilty of no bad faith or fraud, and had no intent to deceive the insurer. " (citations omitted, emphasis supplied)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “All death claims arising under policies of insurance issued or delivered within this state shall be settled by the insurer within sixty days from the date of receipt of due proof of death and should the insurer fail to do so without just cause, then the amount due shall bear interest at the rate of six per cent per annum from date of receipt of due proof of death by the insurer until paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.