¶1ORDER
¶2Angela R. Knowles (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying her post-conviction motion without an evidentiary hearing because the State breached the terms of the plea agreement, causing her to be sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment rather than the fifteen years’ imprisonment set forth in the plea agreement.
¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
¶4The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).