Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

387 F.2d 386

Docket No. 25138.

Wade v. Wainwright

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-12-14

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1969

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Waley v. Johnston · Carpenter v. Wainwright

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-12-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Carroll E. Wade, pro se.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., Robert R. Crittenden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, Fla., for appellee.

Before COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The record reveals that this habeas corpus applicant, presently serving a fifteen year sentence imposed by the State of Florida on August 5, 1965, has never received an evidentiary hearing in either state or federal courts on his contention that his plea of guilty was not voluntary, but was induced by threats and unkept promises. The allegations are sufficient to require such a hearing. Townsend v. Sain (1963), 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770; Waley v. Johnston (1942), 316 U.S. 101, 62 S.Ct. 964, 86 L.Ed. 1302; Carpenter v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 940; Broxson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 944; Murphy v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1967, 372 F.2d 942. The decision of the district court which denied this petition for a writ of habeas corpus without holding an evidentiary hearing is hereby reversed and the cause is remanded for a hearing on the issue of whether appellant's plea of guilty was understandingly and voluntarily made.

¶2

Reversed.

/387/f2d/386 · .json · Public domain