Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

387 F.2d 388

Docket No. 25046.

Allen v. Cox

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Dec. 12, 1967.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1967-12-12

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1967

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1967-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*389Jonathan Shapiro, Martha M. Wood, Jackson, Miss., for petitioners.

¶2William A. Allain, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger C. Landrum, William Suddath, Jr., Jackson, Miss., Irving Jaffe, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

¶3Before BELL, GOLDBERG and DYER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5It having been represented to the Court on oral argument that discovery proceedings in this cause have not been but can be completed by petitioners in the District Court by January 30, 1968, which is prior to the next regular term of the District Court for the trial of causes, and that certain motions pertaining to further discovery have been and will be filed in the District Court by petitioners;

¶6It is upon consideration ordered that the petition for writ of prohibition or mandamus is denied, without prejudice, however, to the petitioners’ application to the District Court under the rules thereof, and upon good cause shown, for an extension of time for discovery.

¶7The mandate shall issue forthwith.

/387/f2d/388 · .json · Public domain