National Labor Relations Board v. Baltimore Luggage Co.’s Empirical Analysis
387 F.2d 744 · 1967
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2012
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. A. J. Tower Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Shirlington Supermarket, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. Schapiro & Whitehouse, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]o long ... as a party limits itself to truthfully setting forth another party's position on matters of racial interest and does not deliberately seek to overstress and exacerbate racial feelings by irrelevant, inflammatory appeals, we shall not set aside an election on this ground.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“appeals or arguments can have no purpose except to inflame the racial feelings of voters in the election.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“clearly not for the purpose and could not have had the effect of exacerbating racial prejudices”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.