Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 F.2d 880 - Mogge v. District No. 8

Mogge v. District No. 8’s Empirical Analysis

387 F.2d 880 · 1967

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
October 1994
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently October 1994

16 federal appellate ·

901967197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston · Drake Bakeries Incorporated v. Local 50 American Bakery Confectionery Workers International · Consolidated Gas Electric Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co. · Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp. · Pietro Scalzitti Co. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 150

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 301(a) only creates federal jurisdiction, in the absence of diversity of citizenship, with respect to suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization ... or between any such labor organizations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “were patently untenable or clearly wrong ... its refusal to arbitrate would of course have waived the arbitration provisions of the contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had the right to a judicial determination of the threshold question of validity before being required to proceed with arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.