Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 F.3d 21 - Nicolaci

Nicolaci’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
October 2023
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 14 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently October 2023

4 federal appellate · 14 district ·

130200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Starr v. Fordham · Shea v. BAY STATE GAS CO. CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. · Coll v. PB Diagnostic Systems, Inc. · Allen v. Adage, Inc. · Paul Lohnes v. Level Communications Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]mbiguity is not created merely because the litigants disagree about the meaning of a contract.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “contract interpretation is a question of law for the court unless the contract is ambiguous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.