Ryan v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis
387 F.3d 785 · 2004
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2012
most recently cited
11 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Liteky et al United States · Dusky v. United States · Pate v. Robinson · Tumey v. State of Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the state court arrives at a conclusion opposite to that reached by [the] Court on a question of law or ... decides a case differently than [the] Court has on a set of materially indistinguishable facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Palmer v. Clarke“contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Palmer v. Clarke“based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Palmer v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.