Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

387 F.3d 968

Docket No. 03-35279.

Gifford Pinchot Task Force v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2004.

Filed August 6, 2004.

Amended October 28, 2004.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2004-08-06

3 counsel of record

Relies on Gifford Pinchot Task Force v. United States Fish & Wildlife Service

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-08-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2024

2 federal appellate · 5 district ·

90200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Stephanie M. Parent, Pacific Environmental Advocacy Center, Portland, OR, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

R. Justin Smith, United States Department of Justice, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendant-appellee.

James P. Walsh, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, San Francisco, CA, for defendant-intervenor-appellee American Forest Resource Council.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Franklin D. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-05462-FDB.

Before BRUNETTI, McKEOWN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

The Appellants' Motion for Technical Correction of Language in the Opinion is hereby GRANTED.

¶2

The opinion filed on August 6, 2004 and published at 378 F.3d 1059, is AMENDED as follows.

¶3

The final sentence of Subsection I.A. on page 1063 states:

¶4

If jeopardy or adverse modification cannot be avoided, the BiOp would exempt the action agency from Section 9's prohibition on taking and the strict civil and criminal penalties associated with such unlawful takings.

¶5

That final sentence of Subsection I.A. on page 1063 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following sentence:

¶6

If the BiOp concludes that jeopardy or adverse modification cannot be avoided, Section 7(g) of the ESA provides that the action agency may apply for an exemption from Section 9's prohibition on taking and the strict civil and criminal penalties associated with such unlawful takings.

¶7

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/387/f3d/968 · .json · Public domain