Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 MASS 169 - Commonwealth v. Hason

Commonwealth v. Hason’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
2
states following
October 2021
most recently cited

3 district · 101 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Commonwealth v. Santaliz (1992), 29 Mass. App. Ct. 613 - Commonwealth v. Arias (1990)

3 district · 101 state decisions

32019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In dealing with probable cause ... we deal with probabilities.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Probable cause exists where 'the facts and circumstances within ... [the officers'] knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information [are] sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that' an offense has been or is being committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The officers must have entertained rationally 'more than a suspicion of criminal involvement, something definite and substantial, but not a prima facie case of the commission of a crime, let alone a case beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.