Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 Mass. 43 - Weaver v. Commonwealth

Weaver v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 15 district · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 100 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Haley v. City of Boston (2011), Taygeta Corp. v. Varian Associates, Inc. (2002)

4 federal appellate · 15 district · 79 state decisions

31019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dwyer v. Globe Newspaper Co. · Whitney v. City of Worcester · Gaudette v. Webb · Morash & Sons, Inc. v. Commonwealth · Gallant v. Worcester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A civil action shall not be instituted against a public employer on a claim for dainages under this chapter unless the claimant shall have first presented his claim in writing to the executive officer of such public employer within two years after the date upon which the cause of action arose ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The Act requires presentment to the official who has the authority to settle a claim before suit is instituted. . . . Thus, without an actual presentment made in strict compliance with the statute, the executive officer with the authority to settle a claim could not be assured of an adequate opportunity to investigate the circumstances surrounding that claim in order to determine whether an offer of settlement should be made. In addition, the individual to whom presentment must be made is that officer charged with the over-all financial and budgetary responsibility for the agency or department whose employees’ actions allegedly gave rise to the plaintiff’s claim.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““the secretary of an executive office of the commonwealth, or in the case of any agency not within the executive office, the attorney general; the adjutant general of the military forces of the commonwealth; the county commissioners of a county; the mayor of a city, or as designated by the charter of the city, the selectmen of a town or as designated by the charter of the town; and the board, directors, or committee of a district in the case of the public employers of a district, and, in the case of any other public employer, the nominal chief executive officer or board” (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.