Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 Mass. 488 - Commonwealth v. Sheppard

Commonwealth v. Sheppard’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2007 · most notably United States v. Leon (1984), Massachusetts v. Sheppard (1984)

3 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

200198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Mapp v. Ohio · Franks v. Delaware · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Rakas v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “informed Detective O'Malley that the warrant as delivered over was sufficient authority in form and content to carry out the search as requested,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The exclusionary rule may not be well tailored to deterring judicial misconduct. If applied to judicial misconduct, the rule would be just as costly as it is when it is applied to police misconduct, but it may be ill-fitted to the job-created motivations of judges. . . . [I]deally a judge is impartial as to whether a particular piece of evidence is admitted or a particular defendant convicted. Hence, in the abstract, suppression of a particular piece of evidence may not be as effective a disincentive to a neutral judge as it would be to the police. It may be that a ruling by an appellate court that a search warrant was unconstitutional would be sufficient to deter similar conduct in the future by magistrates.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[a] fifth bottle of amaretto liquor, 2 nickel bags of marijuana, a woman's jacket that has been described as black-grey (charcoal), possessions of Sandra D. Boulware, similar type wire and rope that match those on the body of Sandra D. Boulware, or in the above [T]hunderbird. Blunt instrument that might have been used on the victim. Men's or women's clothing that may have blood, gasoline, burns on them. Items that may have fingerprints of the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.