Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 Mich. 167 - People v. Lorentzen

People v. Lorentzen’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
15
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently September 1997 · most notably 8 Cal. 3d 410 - In Re Lynch (1972), Opinions of the Justices to the House of Representatives (1979)

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions — followed in 15 states

410197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O'Neil v. State of Vermont

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Experts on penology and criminal corrections tend to be of the opinion that, except for extremely serious crimes or unusually disturbed persons, the goal of rehabilitating offenders with maximum effectiveness can best be reached by short sentences of less than five years' imprisonment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is cruel in its excess of imprisonment and that which accompanies and follows imprisonment. It is unusual in its character. Its punishments come under the condemnation of the bill of rights, both on account of their degree and kind.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The decency test, of necessity, looks to comparative law for guidelines in determining what penalties are widely regarded as proper for the offense in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.