State v. Luckett’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2010
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Del. v. Nicholas · State v. Ware · State v. Sangster · State v. Ohnmacht · State v. Hutchison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Allegations of use of a firearm. If the offense charged is one for which the defendant, if convicted, will be subject by reason of the Code* to a minimum sentence because of use of a firearm, the allegation of such use, if any, shall be contained in the [trial information]. If use of a firearm is alleged as provided by this rule, and if the allegation is supported by the evidence, the court shall submit to the jury a special interrogatory concerning this matter, as provided in R. Cr. P. 21(2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dann“The legal or element test requires the lesser offense to be composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater offense_ The factual test requires the court to determine whether there is a sufficient factual basis in the record for submitting the included offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mount
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.