Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 NW2D 349 - Jones v. Blair

Jones v. Blair’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably Walsh v. United States (1994), Godar v. Edwards (1999)

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

11019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lundberg v. State of New York · Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction Company · Gibbs Ex Rel. Gibbs v. Wilmeth · Cunningham v. Court · Robarge v. Bechtel Power Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n employee acts within the scope of his employment when the employer has the right to direct the means and manner of doing work, and has the right of control over the employee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) anything that would make it impossible to comply with the statute or ordinance; (2) anything over which the driver has no control which places the driver’s motor vehicle in a position contrary to the provisions of the statute or ordinance; (3) where the driver of the motor vehicle is confronted by an emergency not of the driver’s own making, and by reason of such an emergency, the driver fails to obey the statute; and (4) where a statute specifically provides an excuse or exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Id . Jones held that an employee's receipt of travel reimbursement, without more, did not establish a jury question as to whether the employee was under the control of his employer when he caused an accident while returning home after completing a repair job. Id . at 355-56. The city rests its appeal on Jones . Urging the appropriateness of summary judgment, the city contends it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.