Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 P2D 609 - Hampton v. Danks

Hampton v. Danks’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1979
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pahlka v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. · Bunch v. Perkins · Myers v. Chamness · States Exploration Company v. Reynolds · Squyres v. Klick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A motion for directed verdict or demurrer to evidence should not be sustained unless there is an entire absence of proof tending to show a right to recover; and in passing on the same the trial court must consider as true, all of the evidence favorable to the party against whom motion or demurrer is directed, together with all inferences that may be reasonably drawn therefrom and disregard all conflicting evidence favorable to the movant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.