Olmstead v. Reedy’s Empirical Analysis
1963
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2011
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Tulsa v. Whittenhall · Swisher v. Clark · Hart v. Starnes Lumber Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * No action for such damages may be brought or maintained, however, unless the person claiming the damages shall have filed with the Board a written statement of damages, on a form prescribed by the Board, within sixty (60) days after the date that the damages occurred, or prior to the time that twenty-five percent (25%) of a crop damaged shall have been harvested. * *”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““The language of the statute seems clearly to provide that the filing of the written statement of damages is a condition precedent to the right to commence the action. * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Short v. Jones · McArdle v. Stewart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.