387 Pa. Super. 393 - Commonwealth v. Alston’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Poola v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW · Commonwealth v. Gravely · Commonwealth v. Pyle · 366 Pa. Super. 54 - Commonwealth v. Becker · 380 Pa. Super. 280 - Commonwealth v. Crum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Does the defendant understand the nature of the charges to which he is pleading guilty? (2) Is there a factual basis for the plea? (3) Does the defendant understand that he has the right to trial by jury? (4) Does the defendant understand that he is presumed innocent until he is found guilty? (5) Is the defendant aware of the permissible range of sentences and/or fines for the offenses charged? (6) Is the defendant aware that the judge is not bound by the terms of any plea agreement tendered unless the judge accepts such agreement?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Zorn“Because appellee was misinformed as to the potential sentence he would receive, we must conclude that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily tendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.