Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 S.C. 201 - State v. Herring

State v. Herring’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

36 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California · Johnson v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A warrant issued hereunder shall be issued only upon an affidavit sworn to before the magistrate, municipal judicial officer, or judge of a court of record establishing the grounds for the warrant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “an extreme measure which should be taken only where an incident is so grievous that the prejudicial effect can be removed in no other way.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.