State v. Herring’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
36
cited by 36 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Chimel v. California · Schmerber v. State of California · Johnson v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common-sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robinson · State v. Wright“A warrant issued hereunder shall be issued only upon an affidavit sworn to before the magistrate, municipal judicial officer, or judge of a court of record establishing the grounds for the warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clay, Sara Kathrine“an extreme measure which should be taken only where an incident is so grievous that the prejudicial effect can be removed in no other way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.