387 So. 2d 1097 - State v. Vincent’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 493 So. 2d 766 - State v. Jacobs (1986), 431 So. 2d 358 - State v. Vaughn (1983)
41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Benton v. Maryland · State v. Didier · State v. Doughty · State v. Bonfanti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"C. This Section shall not be applicable in cases where more than five years have elapsed since the expiration of the maximum sentence, or sentences, of the previous conviction, or convictions, and the time of the commission of the last felony for which he has been convicted. In computing the period of time as provided herein, any period of servitude by a person in a penal institution, within or without the state, shall not be included in the computation of any of said five year periods."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Simple burglary requires proof of an unauthorized entry with intent to commit a felony or any theft therein. Receiving stolen things does not require this proof. Conversely, receiving stolen things requires proof that the thing was the subject of a robbery or a theft; simple burglary does not require this proof. Hence, the two crimes are not the same offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he crime of burglary was completed upon entry into the car with the intent to commit the theft therein, whereas the theft did not occur until the defendant actually took the watch from the glove compartment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.