Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 So. 2d 275 - Corn v. State

387 So. 2d 275 - Corn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 1991
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · United States v. Marion · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of Kentucky · Smith v. Hooey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"This delay is long enough to be `presumptively prejudicial' and trigger inquiry into the other factors bearing on the alleged denial of a speedy trial. Since this delay is `patently offensive' we must determine whether it is `unjustified'. However, this delay is not sufficient in and of itself to justify a finding that the guarantee of a speedy trial has been violated." (Citations omitted).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"There was no evidence, other than the defendant's own testimony, that these alleged witnesses were no longer available.... There was absolutely no showing of the particular facts to which they would allegedly testify. See United States v. Mays, 549 F.2d 670 , 677 (9th Cir.1977)."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “deliberate attempt by the State to ... enhance its own case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.