Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 So. 2d 300 - Pope v. State

387 So. 2d 300 - Pope v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 1994
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 347 So. 2d 1377 - Ex Parte Thompson · 354 So. 2d 1172 - Conley v. State · 366 So. 2d 1145 - Kelley v. State · Thigpen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant bears the burden of bringing the record before an appellate court. He and his counsel have the duty of checking the record before submitting the appeal. It is their duty to file a correct record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Rule 10 (f), Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure . . . specifically authorizes the correction of an omission from the record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.