Lake County v. Friedel’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 223 So. 2d 713 - Shingleton v. Bussey · 354 So. 2d 362 - Carlile v. GAME AND FRESH WATER FISH COM'N · 62 So. 2d 732 - Williams v. City of Lake City · L. B. McLeod Construction Co. v. State Ex Rel. Benefit of Standard Oil Co. · STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Bromante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“common law privilege, as a political subdivision of the state, to be prosecuted in a tort action only in [that county]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.