387 So. 2d 613 - Bond v. Jack’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2017
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · Canter v. Koehring Company · Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. · Bienvenu v. Angelle · 367 So. 2d 137 - Brandon v. State, Through Dept. of Highways
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Therefore, if our examination reveals that the jury charges were either so incorrect or inadequate as to preclude the jury reaching a verdict in accordance with the law and facts, we must render a judgment on the record as if we had the case before us for a trial de novo."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“render any judgment which is just, legal, and proper upon the record on appeal. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.