387 So. 2d 825 - Young v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

11 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"(2) The extent and nature of the child's prior delinquency record; "(3) The nature of past treatment efforts and the nature of the child's response to such efforts;”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 466 So. 2d 81 - Ex Parte Anonymous · 435 So. 2d 53 - Ray v. State

2. “no statement or finding in the order of the trial court to show that it considered those specific factors in § 12-15-34(d)”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Ex Parte SB · Duncan v. State

3. “Code of 1975, § 12-15-34 (d), . . . requires a district court to consider evidence of six specific (and other relevant) factors in determining whether a transfer motion should be granted. Upon a trial de novo in circuit court, those same factors apply in the determination of the question of transfer, and the circuit court order must reflect consideration of those specific factors. Were it otherwise, we could be faced with the anomalous situation in which on the same issue, the propriety of transfer, two courts would apply different standards. Those factors which each court must consider are:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 404 So. 2d 639 - McKinney v. State