Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 SW2D 377 - Ex Parte Yates

Ex Parte Yates’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably Ex Parte Gorena (1979), Ex Parte Hall (1993)

26 state decisions

100196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Davis · Ex Parte Preston · Ex Parte Britton · Harvey v. Harvey · 47 Tex. Crim. 208 - Ex Parte Latham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The order itself reveals that the money which Yates was being ordered to pay to Mrs. Yates was not property found to be owned by Mrs. Yates and in the possession of Yates, but was money to be earned by Yates in the future. The order does not . . . make a division of the property and direct a surrender to the clerk of the court property held by Yates. The record clearly shows that Yates is being imprisoned for debt in violation of the Texas Constitution. 387 S.W.2d at 380 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There are many instances in the proceedings of the courts where the performance of an act may be enforced by imprisonment and would not come within the prohibition of the Constitution, although it might involve the payment of money.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.