Henley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2013
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. United States · 172 Tex. Crim. 7 - Gaskin v. State · Sewell v. State · 166 Tex. Crim. 556 - Bridges v. State · Torres v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While paregoric is not included within the statutory definition of a narcotic drug, the proof shows that it is, in fact, a narcotic drug known under the official name of ‘camphorated tincture of opium’ and that it contains morphine which comes from opium, a narcotic drug enumerated in the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Wilson““. . . We agree with appellant’s contention that he would have had standing to urge this complaint, under the authority of Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 , had he been on the premises at the time of the search. . . . ””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holcomb v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.