Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 SW3D 654 - Daugherty, Tonya Jean

Daugherty, Tonya Jean’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas))

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Malik v. State · Curry v. State · Gollihar v. State · Cook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accurately sets out the law, is authorized by the indictment, does not unnecessarily increase the State's burden of proof or unnecessarily restrict the State's theories of liability, and adequately describes the particular offense for which the defendant was tried.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Texas 'immaterial variance' law as set out in Gollihar does not apply to the specific statutory elements alleged in the indictment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.