Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 387 U.S. 213 - Northeastern Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States

Northeastern Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2003 · most notably Ahmanson Foundation v. United States (1981), United States v. Sinclair (1971)

51 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

67019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedNortheastern Pennsylvania National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 2041 · 26 U.S.C. § 2056 · 26 U.S.C. § 812

Relies on Pennsylvania Railroad v. Rychlik · United States v. Stapf · Jackson v. United States · Trop v. Dulles · Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Congress' intent to afford a liberal 'estate-splitting' possibility to married couples, where the deductible half of the decedent's estate would ultimately if not consumed be taxable in the estate of the survivor, is unmistakable.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) In general. Section 2056(b)(5) provides that if an interest in property passes from the decedent to his surviving spouse (whether or not in trust) and the spouse is entitled for life to all the income from the entire interest or all the income from a specific portion of the entire interest, with a power in her to appoint the entire interest or the specific portion, the interest which passes to her is a deductible interest, to the extent that it satisfies all five of the conditions set forth below (see paragraph (b) of this section if one or more of the conditions is satisfied as to only a portion of the interest): (1) The surviving spouse must be entitled for life to all of the income from the entire interest or a specific portion of the entire interest, or to a specific portion of all the income from the entire interest. (2) The income payable to the surviving spouse must be payable annually or at more frequent intervals. (3) The surviving spouse must have the power to appoint the entire interest or the specific portion to either herself or her estate. (4) The power in the surviving spouse must be exercisable by her alone and (whether exercisable by will or during life) must be exercisable in all events. (5) The entire interest or the specific portion must not be subject to a power in any other person to appoint any part to any person other than the surviving spouse.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(T)he underlying purpose (of the deduction) was to equalize the incidence of the estate tax in community property and common-law jurisdictions. Under a community property system a surviving spouse takes outright ownership of half of the community property, which therefore is not included in the deceased spouse's estate. The marital deduction allows transfer of up to one-half of noncommunity property to the surviving spouse free of the estate tax.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.