Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

387 U.S. 240

87 S. Ct. 1707

18 L. Ed. 2d 745

Docket No. 24, Misc.

Greene v. Texas

Full caption · 3 consolidated cases

  • George H. GREENE, Jrv.TEXAS. No.11 99. Supreme Court of the United States May 22, 1967 Buck C. Miller, for appellant. Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, George M. Cowden, First Asst. Atty. Gen., R. L. Lattimore, Howard M. Fender, Robert E. Owen and Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. Attys. Gen., and A. J. Carubbi, Jr., for appellee. djQ PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari,
  • Belcherv.Wisconsin. [87SCt1707,387US241,18LEd2d746] 87 S.Ct. 1707 387 U.S
  • 241 18 L.Ed.2d 746 John BELCHERv.WISCONSIN

Supreme Court of the United States

May 22, 1967

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1967-05-22

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1967

Relies on Anders v. California · Belcher v. Wisconsin · Frazier v. Lane, Warden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-05-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John Belcher,pro se.

Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen. of Wisconsin, and William A. Platz and Warren H. Resh, Asst. Attys. Gen., for respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin for further consideration in light of Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493.

¶2

Mr. Justice BLACK, Mr. Justice HARLAN, and Mr. Justice STEWART are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

/387/us/240 · .json · Public domain