Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

387 U.S. 95

18 L. Ed. 2d 586

Docket No. 1089.

Blankenship v. Holding

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1967-05-15

Relies on Jackson v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1967-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1988

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

40196719701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Charles Nesbitt, Atty. Gen. of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Probable jurisdiction noted. The judgment of the District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma entered November 4, 1966, is affirmed insofar as it adjudged provisions of §§ 1040.1 to 1040.10 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes to be unconstitutional.

¶2

Affirmed.

/387/us/95 · .json · Public domain