Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 A2D 1273 - State v. Lopez

State v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
January 2006
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 2006

5 state decisions

201978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Ohio · Bates v. State Bar · Jeffers v. United States · Simuel v. United States · Horning v. District of Columbia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent defendant's consent or other justification, a trial commenced should proceed to conclusion before the chosen factfinder.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that as a practical matter the tactics employed in a jury trial may differ from those that would be used in a bench trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.