Dupoint v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
388 F.2d 39 · 1967
Citation profile
47 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably United States v. Pepe (1984), United States v. Cowan (1975)
47 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5173 · 26 U.S.C. § 5179 · 26 U.S.C. § 5180
Relies on United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Salinger v. Loisel · Thomas v. United States · Sykes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed. The court shall fix the place of trial within the district with due regard to the convenience of the defendant and the witnesses and the prompt administration of justice.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as otherwise permitted by statute or by these rules, the prosecution shall be had in a district in which the offense was committed, but if the district consists of two or more divisions the trial shall be had in a division in which the offense was committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`The Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure have the force and effect of law. Just as a statute, the requirements promulgated in these Rules must be obeyed.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.