Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 F.2d 495 - National Labor Relations Board v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

388 F.2d 495 · 1967

Citation profile

153
cited by 153 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

120 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 153 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2011 · most notably National Labor Relations Board v. City Disposal Systems, Inc. (1984), Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1977)

120 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

920196719701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp. · National Labor Relations Board v. Universal Camera Corp. · Bon-R Reproductions, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 153 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “" 'the Board may reject the [hearing officer's] findings, even though they are not clearly erroneous, if the other evidence provides sufficient support for the Board's decision. But it seems that the Board's supporting evidence, in cases where it rejects the [hearing officer's] findings, must be stronger than would be required in cases where the findings are accepted, since in the former cases the supporting evidence must be deemed substantial when measured against the [hearing officer's] contrary findings as well as the opposing evidence. ' "”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]hile interest on the part of fellow employees would indicate a concerted purpose, activities involving attempts to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed to be for concerted purposes even in the absence of such interest by fellow employees.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(w)hile the standard set forth in Universal Camera is imprecise 'it provides as much clarity as the area affords.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.