Lee v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
388 F.2d 737 · 1968
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently March 1989 · most notably United States v. Baxter (1973), United States v. Kennedy (1989)
22 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Mooney v. Holohan · Giles v. State of Maryland · United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Meers, Relator-Appellee v. Walter H. Wilkins, Warden of Attica State Prison, Attica, New York · Curtis v. Rives
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[T]he defendant's initial burden of showing the nature of the suppressed testimony has been met by inference. It is then incumbent upon the [prosecution] to rebut the prima facie case of the defendant by disclosing the nature of the potential testimony as communicated to it at the time of trial."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.