Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

388 F.2d 985

Docket No. 21665.

Nelson v. Clark

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-01-16

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 1984

2 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. F Tellier

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-01-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., Robert R. Granucci, Michael Buzzell, Deputy Attys. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Thomas N. Clark, in pro. per.

Before CHAMBERS, POPE and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The order of that court granting a writ of habeas corpus should be vacated and the petition reconsidered in the light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705, which was not available to that court at the time of its decision herein.

/388/f2d/985 · .json · Public domain