Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 388 F.3d 1189 - Newton v. Diamond

Newton v. Diamond’s Empirical Analysis

388 F.3d 1189 · 2003

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
August 2023
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Johnson v. Gordon (2005), L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc. (2012)

14 federal appellate · 3 district ·

240200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 102 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976) · 17 U.S.C. § 107 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Martin Weiner Corp. · Warner Bros Inc Ag Dc v. American Broadcasting Companies Inc J · Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp. · Castle Rock Entertainment, Inc. v. Carol Publishing Group, Inc. · Laureyssens Nv v. Idea Group Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not conclusive of infringement. Some copying is permitted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “no reasonable juror could find [it] to be a quantitatively or qualitatively significant portion of the [four-and-a-half-minute] composition as a whole.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A 'use is de minimis only if the average audience would not recognize the appropriation.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.